Legal Opinion

State v. Rotenberry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1981No. 814SC485PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Defendant has brought forward on appeal all forty-one of his assignments of error and has incorporated them into nine arguments.

Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s allowance of the State’s motion to continue his probable cause hearing. The hearing was initially scheduled for 12 August 1980. At approximately 3:10 p.m. on said date, the State moved for a continuance on the basis that none of the State’s witnesses was present. The trial court allowed the motion after finding that an extraordinary cause had been shown which justifed the continuance. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. MusselwhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. PettifordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API