Legal Opinion

State v. Price

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 397A83PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

The defendant brings forward two assignments of error. We find no merit in either assignment.

The defendant first contends that the trial court erred in allowing the State to amend the bill of indictment for murder to allege the date of the offense rather than the date of death. The bill of indictment, as returned by the Johnston County grand jury on 21 February 1983, charged the defendant with the murder of Milton Ferrell on 5 February 1983, which was the date Ferrell died. At trial the district attorney moved to change the date to reflect the date the offense occurred,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. HollimanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. BrinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API