Legal Opinion
PaineWebber Inc. v. Magisano (In Re Magisano)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 23, 1998No. Bankruptcy No. 97-50846, Adversary No. 97-0130PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DONALD E. CALHOUN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
The matters before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Andrew J. Magisano (“Magisano”); the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff PaineWebber Incorporated (“Paine-Webber”); and the subsequent responses and replies. Both parties assert that no genuine issues of material fact exist, and that the Court is in a position to decide the Motions for Summary Judgment based on the pleadings filed.
This Court is vested with jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Farley v. Romano (In Re Romano)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- E.L. Hamm & Associates, Inc. v. Sparrow (In Re Sparrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Urological Group, Ltd. v. Petersen (In Re Petersen)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2003
- In Re ShelbyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
- Chapman v. Pomainville (In Re Pomainville)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.