Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Urological Group, Ltd. v. Petersen (In Re Petersen)

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided July 18, 2003No. 15-80189PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS L. PERKINS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter having come before the Court for trial on complaints brought by the Urological Group, Ltd. (“GROUP”), the former employer of the Debtor, Julie R. Petersen (“DEBTOR”), against her, seeking to deny her discharge and a determination that the debt owing is nondischargeable. The trial spanned four days and the Court heard testimony from fif teen witnesses. Also taken with the adversary complaints is the DEBTOR’S objection to the proof of claim filed by the GROUP in the main case proceeding.

The DEBTOR was employed by the GROUP for nineteen…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Structured Asset Services, L.L.C. v. Self (In Re Self)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  2. MacArthur Co. v. Cupit (In re Cupit)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2014
  3. E.L. Hamm & Associates, Inc. v. Sparrow (In Re Sparrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  4. Schechter v. Hansen (In Re Hansen)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  5. Fiala v. Lindemann (In Re Lindemann)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API