Legal Opinion

Miller v. Stevens

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1899No. 2,873PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Oarroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Wiley, J —

This was an action by appellee to recover from appellant a commission for serviced as a broker. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first is a common count npon the quantum meruit, wherein it is averred that appel*366lee, at the special instance and request of appellant, procured a purchaser for a large general stock of merchandise owned by appellant, and which he desired to sell. In this paragraph it is averred that appellee did procure and furnish such purchaser, and in all things complied with the request of appellant. The second paragraph counts upon an alleged-special…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Shields v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. McFarland v. LillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Mode v. BeasleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Lockwood v. RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCartney v. MalmWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Storer v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Green v. EdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Provident Trust Co. v. DarroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Olcott v. McClureIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API