Legal Opinion
Marzullo v. Crosman Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 24, 2003No. 8:01-cv-02053PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHITTEMORE, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 79) and Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition (Dkt. 84). Upon consideration, Defendant’s Motion is granted.
On April 4, 1999, while walking down a street with friends, Joseph Bryan Marzul-lo was shot by Lalainia Routh, age 17, with a Crosman 2100 Classic air rifle (“Crosman 2100” or “BB gun”) resulting in serious injury to Marzullo. Routh intentionally shot the BB gun knowing it could cause injury. Plaintiffs contend that the Crosman 2100, which was designed with a variable muzzle velocity feature,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stewart v. Happy Herman's Cheshire Bridge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Hunnings v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Faddish v. Buffalo PumpsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Pinchinat v. Graco Children's Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Colville v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2008
- Cooper v. OLD WILLIAMSBURG CANDLE CORP.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- John Morrell & Co. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.