Legal Opinion
Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided August 2, 2012No. Case No. 08-80724-CIVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DANIEL T.K. HURLEY, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Warren Pumps, LLC (“Warren Pumps”), Crane Company (“Crane”) and Westinghouse Company (n/k/a CBS Corporation)(‘Westinghouse”)[ECF Nos. 105, 108 and 109]. For reasons outlined below, the court has determined to grant the motions.
I. Procedural Background
Defendants Warren Pumps, Crane and Westinghouse made pumps, valves and turbines used in Navy warships. Ruth Faddish, as personal representative of the Estate of her deceased…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Cabasug v. Crane Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Cabasug v. Crane Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Morgan v. Bill Vann Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
- Waite v. AII Acquisition Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.