Legal Opinion
Stall v. First National Bank of Buhl
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 22, 1985No. C8-85-511PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Appellant David Stall, an attorney, brought this action against the First National Bank of Buhl to recover attorney’s fees on two collection matters undertaken by him on behalf of the bank. The trial court found that Stall was not entitled to a contingent fee on the first matter and that he was not entitled to his fee on an hourly basis on the second matter, and entered judgment for the bank. Stall appeals from the judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
David Stall is an attorney who practices in the area of creditor collection. He brought this action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Estate of Serbus v. SerbusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Burns v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- In re SpellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Staples v. McKnight, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees Between Stowman Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Ashford v. Interstate Trucking Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Munoz v. PIPESTONE FINANCIAL, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., & Lori Peterson Law FirmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.