Burns v. Stewart
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Donald C. Odden, Justice. *
This matter is before the court on an appeal from a judgment dismissing plaintiff-appellant’s claim for the reasonable value of attorney’s services rendered on behalf of LaRue Y. Stewart. The dismissal was predicated on the trial court’s conclusion that plaintiff had been retained in what amounted to a contingent fee arrangement in a divorce matter, such that under decisions of this court no recovery was permissible. We disagree.
The record presented contains evidence indicating that the basic facts of the dispute are as follows: LaRue Y. Stewart and Richard B.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- City of St. Louis Park v. EngellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- McMahon v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- Paynesville Land Co. v. GrabowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Gillespie v. GillespieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marquis & Aurbach v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Ross v. DeLorenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees Between Stowman Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Aker v. State Dept. of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Stall v. First National Bank of BuhlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.