Legal Opinion

Staples v. McKnight

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 30, 1988No. 05-88-00184-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWE, Justice.

Appellees, Mary D. McKnight and McKnight & Fouts, P.C., sued appellants, Ernest L. Staples, Joyce R. Staples, and Twix, Inc., to recover under a contingent fee agreement for legal services rendered to appellants in the course of a prior lawsuit. The trial court entered judgment on a jury verdict in favor of appellees for the full contingent fee. In their second point of error, appellants complain that the trial court erred in granting judgment for appel-lees because there was no evidence of just cause excusing McKnight’s voluntary withdrawal from the case. For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Royden v. ArdoinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Upgrade Corp. v. Michigan Carton Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Estate of Thomasson v. Boatmen's National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Spera v. Fleming, Hovenkamp & Grayson, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Madeksho v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols & Friend, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. Diaz v. Attorney General of State of Tex., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  4. Augustson v. Linea Aerea Nacional-Chile S.A. (LAN-Chile)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Carbonic Consultants, Inc. v. Herzfeld & Rubin, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API