Staples v. McKnight
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
ROWE, Justice.
Appellees, Mary D. McKnight and McKnight & Fouts, P.C., sued appellants, Ernest L. Staples, Joyce R. Staples, and Twix, Inc., to recover under a contingent fee agreement for legal services rendered to appellants in the course of a prior lawsuit. The trial court entered judgment on a jury verdict in favor of appellees for the full contingent fee. In their second point of error, appellants complain that the trial court erred in granting judgment for appel-lees because there was no evidence of just cause excusing McKnight’s voluntary withdrawal from the case. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Royden v. ArdoinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Upgrade Corp. v. Michigan Carton Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Estate of Thomasson v. Boatmen's National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Spera v. Fleming, Hovenkamp & Grayson, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Madeksho v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols & Friend, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Diaz v. Attorney General of State of Tex., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Augustson v. Linea Aerea Nacional-Chile S.A. (LAN-Chile)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Carbonic Consultants, Inc. v. Herzfeld & Rubin, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.