Legal Opinion
Aronoff v. City of Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 2, 1958No. 7055PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FANNING, Justice.
This is a condemnation case and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Appellees, Texas Turnpike Authority and the City of Dallas, Texas, instituted this suit on November 21, 1956, to condemn a tract of land with improvements thereon located on South Industrial Boulevard in Dallas, Texas. The property involved was owned by Rochelle Aronoff and her husband, Nathan Aronoff, subject to the leasehold estates of Federal Sign Company of Texas and Davis-McPhail Electric Company. The property was condemned for the purpose of constructing thereon a part of an interchange between…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Houston North Shore Railway Co. v. TyrrellTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Reeves v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- City of St. Louis v. RossiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Delfeld v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Urban Renewal Agency v. TrammelTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Dothan v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.