Legal Opinion
Urban Renewal Agency v. Trammel
Texas Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1966No. A-11389PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENHILL, Justice.
This is a condemnation case. The main question is whether there is evidence to support the jury’s finding as to the market value of the property taken. Also involved is the wording of the special issues on valuation submitted to the jury. This latter problem arises because one of the buildings upon the land was subject to a lease for a term of years.
D. P. Trammel and wife owned business property in Lubbock. A portion of the property was leased to Harold Deering for a grocery store. The property was condemned by the Urban Renewal Agency, and special commissioners made an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reeves v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Aronoff v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- In re Delancey StreetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- City of Dothan v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Texas Electric Service Company v. LineberyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Dahl Ex Rel. Dahl v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- City of Beaumont v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. Ware, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Texas Pig Stands, Inc. v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.