Legal Opinion

Houston North Shore Railway Co. v. Tyrrell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1936No. 7082PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge SMEDLEY

of the Commission of Appeals delivered the opinion for the court.

Since the question certified by the Court of Civil Appeals is in substance whether the pleadings and evidence stated in the certificate precluded the condemnation sought by appellants, it is necessary to set out the entire certificate and the copy of the deed attached to it as an exhibit. They are as follows:

“The question of law hereinafter certified arises out of the facts appearing in the record of this cause, now pending undetermined • here on appeal from the County Court at_Law of Harris County, which — for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Fort Worth Improvement District No. 1 v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Higgins v. McCreaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Goldstein v. Union National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. McInnis v. Brown County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Ross, Inc. v. LeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Cowden v. Broderick & Calvert, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API