Gwynn v. Dierssen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Paterson, J.—
This is an action to quiet title. The plaintiff’s title to the locus in quo is derived as follows: 1. A grant, no consideration being named, from W. B. Taylor, who was at the time the owner of the land, to Cornelia S. Gwynn, November 5, 1880; 2. Deed, grant, bargain, and sale in form, expressing a consideration of three hundred and fifty dollars, from Cornelia S. Gwynn to R. W. Bessinger, June 4, 1887; 3. Deed from R. W. Bessinger to plaintiff, December, 1887; 4. Deed from plaintiff to C. S. Gwynn, consideration love and affection, dated September 6,1888; 5. Deed from C. S. Gwynn…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Jordan v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Weyse v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Reclamation District No. 108 v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hearst v. EgglestoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nilson v. SarmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Albright v. AlbrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Lewis v. Thomas BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Booker v. CastilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.