Legal Opinion

Weyse v. Crawford

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1890No. 13523PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an. order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This action is prosecuted to secure an injunction restraining defendant, tax collector of the county of Los Angeles, from selling certain real prop*198erty, known as Naud’s warehouse, for delinquent taxes for the year 1887-88. Judgment for defendant, motion for new trial denied, and plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs were the owners and in possession of divers pieces of real property, and, among others, of that known as Naud’s warehouse, holding the same as tenants in common, the plaintiff O. G. Weyse being the manager, and having the control thereof. In or about the month of April, 1887, 0. G. Weyse,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Leet v. Wadsworth & MeisegaesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Dranga v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Miller v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. RCA Photophone Inc. v. HuffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Perham v. PutnamMontana Supreme Court · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API