Booker v. Castillo
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order refusing a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment and an order denying their motion for a new trial in an action commenced by plaintiff on June 12, 1905, to have it determined that the estate of his testatrix is the owner of a tract of land containing some 160 acres in San Luis Obispo County, and that defendants’ claims thereto are without right. Plaintiff’s claim, sustained by the findings and judgment, is that the estate of Mrs. Andrews owns the whole property. The defendants’ claim is that such estate owns only an undivided eight twelfths thereof, that four of the defendants, surviving…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nilson v. SarmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Peiser v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Jordan v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Lewis v. Thomas BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Stewart v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stafford v. MartinoniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- McAlvay v. Consumers' Salt Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Pacific Fruit Exchange v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hull-Dobbs Co. of Puerto Rico v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- People v. One 1959 MG Sport Coupé License Number Seg 469California Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.