Legal Opinion

Hearst v. Egglestone

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,887PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Tenth District Court, County of Sierra. Keyser, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Myrick, J.:

This is an action brought to obtain a decree that plaintiff is the owner of the premises described in the complaint, and that defendants have no right, title, estate, or interest therein. Defendants deny plaintiff’s ownership, and allege themselves to be the owners. The findings of the Court are in substance as follows :

That on the 6th of March, 1872, the premises were owned by J ones, Knuthson, and the defendant Mowry, who on that day sold and conveyed the same for $16,000 to plaintiff, who went into possession under the deed, which was duly executed and recorded; at which time,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grimm v. O'ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Grotefend v. UltzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Crawford v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kittle v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Dranga v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Z. Russ & Sons Co. v. CrichtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. City of San Luis Obispo v. PettitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Wilson v. AtkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API