Legal Opinion
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Metropolitan Water District
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 2005No. B166179PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*253Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
This appeal involves the grievance procedure under a memorandum of understanding (the MOU) between the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (the MWD) and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Local 1902, AFL-CIO (the Local), the union representing the MWD’s general employees. During its reorganization, the MWD created a number of new managerial positions. It then issued and amended a list of current supervisory employees who would automatically be placed in some of the new positions, leaving the remaining new jobs open…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Akins v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carlsen v. KoivumakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- City of Claremont v. KruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of TurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Lippman v. City of Oakland, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Munroe v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.