Legal Opinion
Akins v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 2000No. A087975PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
The trial court awarded respondents Ariana Akins and her daughter $85,490 in attorney fees to be paid by appellants Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of San Francisco and Matthew Lehr. Enterprise and Lehr appeal, contending that the trial court erred by not requiring Akins to present a fee claim limited to attorney fees incurred on the successful Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA or the Act) cause of action. (See Civ. Code, 1 §§ 1788-1788.32.) In her brief, Akins also seeks an award of attorney fees on appeal. We affirm the attorney fees order and grant the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Reveles v. Toyota by the BayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Robertson v. Fleetwood Travel Trailers of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bell v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.