Legal Opinion
Lippman v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided December 22, 2017No. A141865PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kennedy, J.*
*209*754Plaintiff Thomas Lippman sought a writ of mandate ( Code Civ. Proc., § 1085 )1 to compel defendant City of Oakland (City) to have an appeals board or the governing body of the City review his citations for blight and substandard living conditions on his rental property. Lippman claimed the City violated the California Building Code (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 24, § 1.8.8) (Building Code) by having a single hearing officer, who had been appointed by the very entity that cited him, hear his claims. The trial court determined the City's administrative appeals process complied with the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reid v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Marquez v. City of Long Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cal. Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Smith, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Anderson v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Byrne v. Santa Cruz County CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.