Legal Opinion
Lewis v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 2002No. 00-238PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[11] Following an aggravated assault and battery, police determined that Appellant Shawn J. Lewis had lied to them about the identity of the assailant. Lewis was arrested for accessory after the fact and interrogated several times while in custody without the advisement of rights mandated by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 486, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). During interrogation, Lewis invented a fictitious name for the assailant and concocted a story for police who began investigating to try to locate a nonexistent suspect. The police's independent investigation soon…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Thai Ngoc Nguyen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Bhutto v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Hathaway v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Grissom v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Gunn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.