Legal Opinion
Thai Ngoc Nguyen v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided July 1, 2009No. PD-0888-08PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
the Court
in which MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, and HERVEY, JJ., joined.
Officer Vance Johnson failed to warn Thai Ngoc Nguyen of all of his rights under Section 3, Article 38.22, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, when he arrested Nguyen for traffic violations and interrogated him. The court of appeals held that the trial judge erred in admitting Nguyen’s oral statement, which constituted the crime of hindering apprehension, because Officer Johnson failed to comply with Section 3.1 We reject the State’s claim that, despite the statutory - violation, Nguyen’s *673statement was admissible. We affirm…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by69 opinions
- Ervin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Jose Marvin Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Baumgart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
- Andre Jamal Sloan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.