Grissom v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶ 1] In February 2004, a Natrona County jury found John Michael Grissom (the appellant) guilty of three crimes: possession of methamphetamine (a misdemeanor); possession of marijuana (a misdemeanor); and possession of methamphetamine 'with the intent to deliver (a felony). The appellant now appeals those convictions, claiming that his trial counsel were ineffective because they did not file a suppression motion and that the evidence received at trial was insufficient to prove that he intended to deliver the methamphetamine in his possession. We affirm.
ISSUES
1. Whether the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dettloff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Bittleston v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Granzer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Pier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Cureton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.