Legal Opinion

Payne v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1999No. ED 75813PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., Judge.

Juan Payne (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant contends the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction motion in that (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for not allowing Movant to testify at trial, and (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for refusing to call Movant’s alibi witnesses at trial. We reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.

Movant was convicted of one count of murder in the second degree, Section 565.021, RSMo 1994, and one count of armed criminal action,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coday v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Marschke v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Ayres v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Kates v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Bewley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API