Legal Opinion

Ayres v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 2002No. ED 80761PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherri B. Sullivan, J.

Introduction

Justin Ayres (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 1 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel in eliciting certain evidence, faffing to request submission of a lesser-included offense instruction, and misinforming Movant of a maximum sentence if convicted at trial. We affirm in part and remand in part.

Factual and Procedural Background

A jury found Movant guilty of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050, 2 and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Sidebottom v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  5. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Brandon T. Black v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Jason C. Voss v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Winder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API