Smith v. Continental Casualty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
— Petitioner West American Insurance Company seeks review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division Two, which reversed a summary judgment in its favor by the Pierce County Superior Court based *76upon the trial court’s conclusion that Respondent Roger Lee Smith was not entitled to coverage under a policy with an underinsured motorist coverage endorsement issued by Petitioner to Respondent’s employer. We reverse.
Question Presented
The question presented in this case is whether an endorsement in an insurance policy which added the lessor of a vehicle as an "additional insured (lessor)”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- American Star Insurance v. GriceWashington Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Findlay v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Findlay v. United Pacific Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
- Dioxin/Organochlorine Ctr. v. POLLUTION CONTROLWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Center v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.