Findlay v. United Pacific Ins. Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
917 P.2d 116 (1996)
129 Wash.2d 368
J. Duncan FINDLAY and Mary E. Findlay, individually and as a marital community, Petitioners,
v.
UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 63129-8.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued February 8, 1996.
Decided June 6, 1996.
Reed McClure, Michael S. Rogers, William R. Hickman, Seattle, Harbaugh & Bloom, Gary N. Bloom, Spokane, Debra Stephens, Bryan Harnetiaux, Spokane, for Amicus Curiae.
Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland, John T. Petrie, Seattle, Tewell & Findlay, Andrew Weisbecker, Seattle, for Petitioner.
Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Hoffman,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Quadrant Corp. v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- American National Fire Insurance Co. v. B & L Trucking and Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- American National Fire Insurance v. B&L Trucking & Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.