Ross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Petitioner State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision which affirmed a summary judgment by the Spokane County Superior Court which granted underinsured motorist insurance coverage to Respondents Clyde and Betty L. Ross, husband and wife, under a policy on an automobile registered in the wife’s name and insured in Washington for an accident the wife had in Washington while driving an automobile registered in the husband’s name and insured in Montana. This Court granted review. We reverse.
QUESTION PRESENTED
The question presented in this case is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Greengo v. Public Employees Mut. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Greengo v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.