Legal Opinion

Ross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1997No. 64564-7PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Petitioner State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision which affirmed a summary judgment by the Spokane County Superior Court which granted underinsured motorist insurance coverage to Respondents Clyde and Betty L. Ross, husband and wife, under a policy on an automobile registered in the wife’s name and insured in Washington for an accident the wife had in Washington while driving an automobile registered in the husband’s name and insured in Montana. This Court granted review. We reverse.

QUESTION PRESENTED

The question presented in this case is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Greengo v. Public Employees Mut. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Greengo v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API