Legal Opinion

Center v. Pollution Control Hearings Board

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1997No. 63262-6PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

We hold that actions which are categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 are in fact exempt.

Boise Cascade Corporation and other pulp and paper mills (mills) appeal a superior court order remanding re-issuance of their mills’ waste water discharge permits to the Pollution Control Hearings Board to determine *348whether these permits constitute a "major action” under the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA), RCW 43.21C.110(l)(a), notwithstanding their categorical exemption. WAC 197-11-855(1) (hereinafter "categorical exemption”). The mills claim this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Diamond v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Simpson Tacoma Kraft Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Noel v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Snohomish County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API