Gimbel v. Gimbel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against her husband, Frederic A. Gimbel, to obtain a judgment for past and future support. Both parties are nonresidents. Named also as defendants were Ber nard F. Gimbel, Alva Gimbel and Frederic A. Gimbel, as trustees under the will of Rachel F. Gimbel, late of the town of Greenwich, deceased. Under the will, certain income from the trust was expressly made payable to the plaintiff’s husband “for his support and maintenance, during the term of his natural life.” The Probate Court for the district of Greenwich has jurisdiction of the trust. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Artman v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Marcil v. A. H. Merriman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Waterbury Trust Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Vincenzo v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Gores v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Altman v. AltmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.