Legal Opinion
Marcil v. A. H. Merriman & Sons, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 20, 1932PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mai/ebie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action against A. H. Merriman & Sons, Incorporated, the owner of a truck being operated by its agent in the delivery of milk, and against Samuel Mlynar, the driver of an automobile in which the plaintiff was riding, to recover for injuries received by her in the collision of the two cars, claiming negligence in the operation of each. The jury returned a verdict against the Company and in favor of Mlynar. The Company moved to set the verdict aside as against the evidence and the trial court denied the motion. The issues raised on the trial had made it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Woodmont Ass'n v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Banca Commerciale Italiana Trust Co. v. Westchester Artistic Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Sparrow v. BromageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Munson v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- In Re Application of Title Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Watson v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- East Side Civic Assn. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Park City Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Walkinshaw v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Long v. Zoning Commission of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.