Legal Opinion
Smith v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1962PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKjstg, J.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. At the commencement of the action, which was brought under General Statutes § 46-29 and sought a legal separation, alimony, counsel fees, and custody of a minor child, both the plaintiff wife and the defendant husband were residents of the state of Connecticut. The facts as to residence and the attendant circumstances make it clear that the domicil of each was then in Connecticut. Prior to the institution of this suit, the defendant had left the family home in Madison, Connecticut, and moved into an apartment in Hartford which he had leased for a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lynn v. LynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Artman v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- LaBow v. LaBowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Weil v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Perrys, Inc. v. Waterbury Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Argent Mortgage Co. v. HuertasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.