Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Hilton
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
A full statement of the case is made in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. 55 S.W.2d 120. An abridged statement will be sufficient for the purposes of this decision.
I. C. Hilton was the employee and Commercial Casualty Insurance Company was the insurer, as those terms are employed in the Workmen's Compensation Law. The employee was injured in the course of his employment. Later a settlement was made between him and the insurer, the terms of which being reduced to writing and signed by the respective parties. After conducting an independent investigation of its own, the Industrial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. HendersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. DayTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
3Cited by62 opinions
- Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- American Motorists Insurance Co. v. FodgeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Brannon v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1949
- Brannon v. Pacific Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Booth v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1938
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.