Legal Opinion

Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Day

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1929No. 1075—5288PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.

This suit involves the construction of section 12, art. 8307, of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, which is as follows: “Where the liability of the association or the extent of the injury of the employs is uncertain, indefinite, or incapable of being satisfactorily established, the Board may approve any compromise, adjustment, settlement or commutation thereof” that is “made between the parties.” In this case it conclusively appears that the defendant in error claimed that he received an injury to one of his eyes on April 19, 1926, while engaged in the work of his employer, who was a subscriber…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Higginson v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. McCarthy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Jenkins v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. EzellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Day v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Brannon v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Brannon v. Pacific Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Cigna Insurance Co. of Texas v. Rubalcada, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  4. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. HiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. LowrieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API