Legal Opinion

Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Henderson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1929No. 1150-5110PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is reported at page 646 of 1 5.W.(2d), and to it we make reference for a general statement of the case.

1. That court applied a presumption of actual receipt (on July 22, 1926) by the Industrial Accident Board of notice of “appeal” (section 5, art. 8307, R. S. 1925), because the “notice” properly addressed, stamped, and registered, was deposited in the mails at Orange and left that place iñ due course at “about 7:20 o’clock p. m. July 21st,” so that, in due course, it should have reached the post office in Austin (locus of the board) early in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Oilmen's Reciprocal Assn. v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Robertson v. Du BoseTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Burton v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Brannon v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Brannon v. Pacific Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. HiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Texas Employers Insurance v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Red Rover Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1941

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API