Legal Opinion

Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1996No. D-4561PublishedCited by 372 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, Justice, joined by Gonzalez, Enoch, Baker and Abbott, Justices,

Corina Saenz sued her employer’s workers’ compensation carrier and its adjuster for wrongfully inducing her to settle her claim and recovered actual damages for future medical costs and mental anguish, and punitive damages. We hold that Saenz’ sole remedy for loss of medical benefits is rescission, that she did not adduce any evidence of mental anguish, and that because she is not entitled to actual damages, she is not entitled to punitive damages. Inasmuch as Saenz expressly disclaims rescission, we render judgment that she take nothing.

I

Saenz had been working as a secretary for about two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Brannon v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Brannon v. Pacific Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. HiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Zubiate, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by372 opinions

  1. Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Fort Worth v. ZimlichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Service Corp. International v. GuerraTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Barker v. EckmanTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Joseph E. Hancock v. Easwaran P. VariyamTexas Supreme Court · 2013

367 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API