Legal Opinion

State v. Kimball

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2008No. 33673PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

James Kimball pleaded guilty to statutory rape in 1992. As a result, he was required to register as a sex offender under Idaho’s Sexual Offender Registration, Notification, and Community Right-to-Know Act, I.C. §§ 18-8301, et seq. (Registration Act). In 2006, Kimball petitioned to have his name removed from the Sex Offender Registry pursuant to I.C. § 18-8310, contending he was not a risk to reoffend. The district court denied the motion. Kimball appealed. We vacate and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

In 1991, James Kimball, then 23 years old,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Adoption of DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Garza v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. TurpenIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Grease Spot, Inc. v. HarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API