Legal Opinion
A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Department of Water Resources
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 2012No. 38403, 38421, 38422PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Chief Justice.
This case involves the Director (Director) of the Idaho Department of Water Resources’ (IDWR) application of the Rules for Conjunctive Management of Surface and Ground Water Resources (CM Rules), IDA-PA 37.03.11, in response to a ground water to ground water delivery call filed by the A & B Irrigation District (A & B). The Director’s Final Order found that A & B was not materially injured and was affirmed by the district court on nearly all points. A & B now appeals to this Court, contending that the Director and the district court erred in them analyses. Cross-appeals…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / SuttonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Rangen, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Rangen, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Blackfoot v. Gary SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- 3G AG LLC v. IDWRIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.