Legal Opinion

Grease Spot, Inc. v. Harnes

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2010No. 35321PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

Appellants Richard and Sherry Harnes request attorney fees they incurred in compelling, defending, and confirming an arbitration against The Grease Spot, Inc. (“Grease Spot”) regarding claims arising from an agreement to purchase the company. The Harneses ask this Court to reverse the district court’s decision denying them most of the attorney fees they incurred before the arbitration and all of the fees they incurred during and after the arbitration.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

Grease Spot is a small company that processes restaurant oil for use…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Houghland Farms, Inc. v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bingham County Commission v. Interstate Electric Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. City of McCall v. BuxtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. County of Clark v. Blanchard Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. F. Kim Bailey v. Kerry BaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Climax, LLC v. Snake River OncologyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Wadsworth Reese, PLLC v. Siddoway & Co, PCIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Sopatyk v. Lemhi CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Bald, Fat & Ugly, LLC v. KeaneIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API