Legal Opinion

Ray v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1999No. 24092PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying the appellant, Donald P. Ray’s (Ray) claims for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

*98I.

BACKGROUND

In 1994, Ray was living with his sister, D.U. and the victim, D.U.’s prepubescent daughter. Sometime during that year, D.U. discovered a videotape, recorded by Ray, which depicted the victim sleeping on the couch and zoomed in on the victim’s crotch area. Ray also hid the video camera in the bathroom in an attempt to videotape the victim using the bathroom. D.U. informed the victim’s counselor, child…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Estrada v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Kellar v. Fayetteville Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API