Legal Opinion

State v. Bunde

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1996No. CX-96-1302, C1-96-1303PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

The district court granted separate motions by respondents Kory Ken Bunde and Jeremy William Francis for dismissal of driving-under-the-influence charges. Each respondent asked for dismissal on the ground that the arresting officer did not have authority to make arrests outside his municipality. On appeal, the State argues that respondent Bunde waived the right to object to the validity of his arrest and that the arresting officer had authority to make both arrests. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondents were arrested in separate incidents by Janesville Police Officer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. TilleskjorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State v. FavorsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PatchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. In re the Civil Commitment of KroppCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State v. DominguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API