Legal Opinion

In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 10, 2017No. A16-1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Kirk, Judge

Appellant, the Minnesota Commissioner of Human Services, challenges the judicial appeal panel’s grant of provisional discharge from MSOP to respondent Eugene Phillip Kropp. On appeal, the commissioner argues that the panel erred by: (1) granting provisional discharge to a nonexistent placement, (2) improperly delegating judicial authority to the executive director of MSOP, and (3) concluding that the commissioner failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that provisional discharge should be denied. Because we conclude that the panel did not err, we affirm.

FACTS

Kropp,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Weber Ex Rel. Weber v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BY THE SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doris A. Seward v. Taylor Florin-Clemants, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  2. In re DuvallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  3. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Ingram OyugiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rodrick Dean Pouncy, JrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. State of Minnesota v. Dylan Thomas PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API