Legal Opinion

State v. Wagner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 2001No. C9-01-903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

R.A. RANDALL, Judge.

The state challenges a pretrial order suppressing evidence of respondent’s intoxication and dismissing the gross-misdemeanor driving-while-intoxicated complaint. The state argues (1) that the district court erred in ruling that the trooper, who saw respondent’s vehicle drive on the shoulder of the road, then cross the center line, then speed up as if to evade the officer, did not have articu-lable suspicion supporting the stop; and (2) that the district court should have collaterally estopped respondent from challenging the legality of the stop when that issue was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. HalversonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  2. Wilkes v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. NetlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. State of Minnesota v. Amanda Sue ThorneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State of Minnesota v. Sharleen Leslie PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API