Legal Opinion

State v. Dominguez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 2003No. C6-02-1159PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant Aldo Acosta Dominguez was found guilty of kidnapping after submitting to a trial on stipulated facts under Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 3. Dominguez appeals his conviction, arguing that because the district court did not make any findings with regard to his intent to commit a felony after having confined or restrained the victims, the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Dominguez also alleges that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an upward sentencing departure.

FACTS

E.P. and L.H. were taken from their car at gunpoint in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. OstremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Carse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Calvin Boswell, Jr. v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API