Legal Opinion

People v. McConnell

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1890No. 20583PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary in the first degree. Prom the judgment rendered in the premises, and an order refusing him a new trial, he appeals.

The ground upon which his contention is based is, that he was not legally committed by a magistrate, and for that reason the superior court, which has tried him, had no jurisdiction to do so. ■ He did not make any motion to set aside the information, but raised the question by demurrer.

In order to sustain a demurrer to the information on the ground that the trial court is without jurisdiction of the offense charged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ex parte MoanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Shortridge v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. TolbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API