People v. Tolbert
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
In this appeal, we decide that the trial court erred in taking judicial notice in aid of defendant’s demurrer of the magistrate’s factual finding at defendant’s preliminary hearing.
An amended information filed in the San Joaquin Superior Court charged defendant in count I with kidnapping (Pen. Code, § 207), in count II with forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), in counts III and IV with forcible oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (c)), and in count V with rape by foreign object (Pen. Code, § 289). In connection with the forcible rape and oral copulation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Parks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Day v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. CarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Gilmore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. BismillahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.