Legal Opinion

Shortridge v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1984No. Civ. 22494PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

The question in this case is whether it is possible to commit the crime of being an accessory in violation of Penal Code section 32 when the principal is a minor. That question turns on whether a minor can commit a felony. We hold that, in the absence of some other statutory disability, all minors 14 years of age and older are capable of committing felonies as a matter of law. Consequently anyone who, with the requisite intent and knowledge, harbors, conceals or aids these youthful principals after the commission of a felony is guilty of being an accessory.

A complaint was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Nino v. Gladys R.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bompensiero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. People v. Manuel L.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bermudez v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. ParteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. People v. TolbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API