Legal Opinion
People v. Hale
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1965No. Crim. 153PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*115CONLEY, P. J.
Upon suggestion of the court, with the acquiescence of respective counsel, three phases of the prosecution of Walter R. Hale, Auditor-Controller of the County of Sacramento, State of California, arising from an accusation brought against him by the Grand Jury of Sacramento County were dealt with in contemporaneous arguments. The proceeding first requiring a ruling is a motion on the part of the respondent to dismiss, on the basic ground that the law does not permit an appeal from the determination of the trial court that there was a complete lack of evidence to warrant the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- People v. . GlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Greenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. KeenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. . SextonNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Stark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. EarleSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. HawesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.