Legal Opinion

Ex parte Moan

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1884No. 10,974PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Application for writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, C. J.

This is an application for discharge on habeas corpus, founded on the following state of facts : —

On the 25th day of September, 1883, a complaint was filed before one Emil Nusbaumer, a justice of the peace of Oakland township, charging the petitioner with the crime of murder, and thereupon he was arrested on the following day, and taken before the magistrate issuing the warrant, by whom an order of commitment for examination was made.

On the 1st day of October, 1883, the petitioner was taken before another justice of the peace of the same township, by whom he was examined and committed, but no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People v. BawdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API