City of Stamford v. Kovac
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a temporary injunction should be deemed a *97permanent injunction, and hence an appealable order, because the injunction orders restorative work to be performed in order to prevent further environmental degradation. The plaintiff, the city of Stamford, brought an action seeking temporary and permanent injunctive relief against the defendant Milivoje Kovac alleging that he was the owner of property that was subject to a stipulated judgment concerning impairment of a wetlands in violation of General Statutes § 22a-36 et seq. On the motion of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Olcott v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Bachman v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tomasso Bros. v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re Darlene C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Clinton v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- County of Du Page v. GavrilosAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Rustici v. MalloyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.